A personal portfolio · Ho Chi Minh City

I didn't start with AI.
I started with a problem.

I'm Amelia Ph. Nguyen — an early-career operator with experience in creator content, commerce and data. I build practical tools to make decisions clearer and workflows more reliable.

Business Administration · UEHData Analytics · VNU-HCM
Portrait of Amelia Ph. Nguyen wearing a black blazer
OPERATIONS × DATA × AI CURIOSITY
Amelia Ph. NguyenFrom business operations to quality systems
Beyond the resume / About Amelia

From real work to better systems.

I’ve worked across product launches, international creator campaigns and aftersales analytics. Across those roles, I kept noticing the same friction: fragmented information, repetitive steps and unclear review criteria. That curiosity led me to workflow automation — and eventually to SIGNAL.

Follow the journey
The path behind the project

From operations to
AI evaluation.

Four chapters, one evolving curiosity. Select a chapter to see what I worked on and what it taught me.

01 / INNO · MAR – SEP 2025

Execution taught me to think commercially.

My first chapter brought me into digital commerce, creator partnerships and product launches. Co-leading TikTok Shop livestreams taught me to connect shopper insights to concrete decisions and measurable results.

VND 3B GMV2 co-led livestreams · 120% of target
What made me curious about AI ↗
Evidence from the work

Measured experience.
Real operational impact.

Results from my roles at INNO, 4AM and Mercedes-Benz Vietnam.

20K+Creator profiles screened4AM · campaign shortlisting
60%Less reporting time4AM · 5h → 2h per ~30 creators
372K+Aftersales records analyzedMercedes-Benz Vietnam · 16 dealers
VND 3BLivestream GMVINNO · 2 co-led sessions · 120% target

These outcomes come from professional experience, not SIGNAL.

The turning point
I wanted to spend less time moving information — and more time making thoughtful decisions.

Manual screening and reporting showed me how much work follows repeatable patterns. I started automating those steps — then asked a harder question: how can we recognize an incorrect automated decision?

See what that question became ↗
THE FIRST QUESTIONWhat parts of this workflow are repetitive?
THE SECOND QUESTIONWhich judgments can be translated into explicit criteria?
THE QUESTION THAT BECAME SIGNALHow do we investigate the decisions that are wrong?
Where curiosity became a tool

Meet SIGNAL.

A creator evaluation experiment that became a study of criteria, missing evidence and human judgment.

INDEPENDENT PROTOTYPE / 2026
SIGNAL app icon

SIGNAL.

A working prototype for traceable rule-based decisions, human review and rubric retesting.

✓ Evidence checks + human review5 5 synthetic QA cases

Interactive rubric demo with synthetic data; not production model benchmarking.

Explore the interactive SIGNAL demo ↗
Screenshot from SIGNAL Rubric Studio prototype showing evaluation criteria, sample review and quality findingsACTUAL PROTOTYPE SCREENSHOT
Let's connect

I like people who ask better questions.

I'm interested in thoughtful technology, operations, data quality and the human decisions behind reliable systems. Happy to connect or exchange ideas.

© 2026 AMELIA PH. NGUYENHO CHI MINH CITY · VIETNAMBUILT WITH CURIOSITY